In France, professional mediators have created an organisation to develop a rational approach to conflict resolution. This approach is based on a “scientific” definition of a person and a conflict. These definitions contribute to the development of a structured mediation process. The mediators have adopted a code of ethics that guarantees professionalism.    The term “mediation” generally refers to any case, in which a third party helps others reach an agreement. Specifically, mediation has a structure, timetable and dynamics that lack “normal” negotiations. The procedure is private and confidential, possibly enforced by law. Participation is usually voluntary. The Mediator acts as a neutral third party and facilitates the process instead of directing it.
Mediation is becoming a more peaceful and internationally accepted solution to end the conflict. Mediation can be used to resolve conflicts of any magnitude. The parties must know that this is the decisive moment to decide to end the dispute by agreeing to sign and respect the final agreement. In the case, they were two sisters who paid an estate through mediation. Only one sister personally participated in the mediation, the other participated by telephone with her lawyers present. An agreement has been reached. At the time, it was explained orally that before the final agreement, a tax consultation should be requested, as such a large capital transfer would trigger capital gains taxes. Other institutions offer mediation presentations in a number of disciplines such as law, social sciences, economics and the humanities. Not all types of placement work require academic qualifications, some having more to do with practical skills than with theoretical knowledge. Affiliated organizations offer training. At the international level, a similar approach is being taken with regard to the training of mediators from organisations such as the Centre for Effective Dispute Resolution (CEDR). Based in London, the company has so far trained more than 5,000 CEDR mediators from different countries.
 The formation of options and alternatives: disputes will be identified jointly or in separate meetings (caucus) with the Ombudsman`s settlement areas. The mediator can summarize the results of private meetings with each party and promote options. The objective of this phase will be to realistically assess the strengths and weaknesses of its own position. Negotiations and decision-making of the parties will continue unless the Ombudsman declares a deadlock and ends mediation or continues mediation at a subsequent meeting. Theorists, particularly Rushworth Kidder, who founded the Institute for Global Ethics in 1980, have argued that mediation is the basis of a post-modern ethic – and that it avoids traditional ethical issues with predefined limits to morality. [Citation required] [Clarification needed] The mediation agreement plays a decisive role in the mediation process. It is a way of saying, “That is what we are all doing here; That is what we need to do; These are the basic rules on which we must agree to make it work. What is in a mediation agreement? As an alternative process, mediation is in itself less formal than traditional processes.
As such, his internal ways are less formal. In many Western cultures, informality is signalled by the use of first names. This is a testament to intimacy and intimacy, which encourages mediation. This should not indicate that the use of first names has the same meaning in all cultures. Within each culture, it is up to mediators and parties to find appropriate ways to create a more relaxed and informal environment. If we propose the use of first names, it is designed as a proxy for informality. This means that in any culture, regardless of the expression and communication of personalization and informality, it is necessary to be involved in mediation. Mediation is highly recommended in the UK.